A group of 17 major record companies, including Universal Music Group, Sony Music Group and Warner Music Group, filed suit on Tuesday against internet service provider (ISP) RCN Corporation. In their complaint, the plaintiffs allege that RCN “knowingly contributed to, and reaped substantial profits from,
Copyright law, as generally under stood, is in essence concerned with the negative right of preventing the copying of physical material existing in the field of literature and art. Its object is to protect the writer and artist from the unlawful reproduction of his material. In an interesting and a path-breaking
Coming straight to the nub of the matter, let me begin by first and foremost pointing out that in its much awaited judgment in the landmark Delhi University photocopying case titled “The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v Rameshwari Photocopy Services”,
Copyright is a form of intellectual property protection granted under Indian law to the creators of original works of authorship such as literary works (including computer programs, tables and compilations including computer databases which may be expressed in words, codes, schemes or in any other
NEWS SCAN The US Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases . In Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc. the court will rule on the appropriate test to determine when a feature of a useful article is protectable undersection 101 of the Copyright Act