Supreme Court cites 26/11 to back installation of CCTVs in courts

The Supreme Court on Tuesday cited the 26/11 Mumbai attack and 2016 Patiala House court violence in Delhi to stress the benefits of installations of CCTV cameras in courts and tribunals, saying it wanted to bring discipline, security and oversight in judicial proceedings.

The top court, while referring to the CCTV grab of convict Ajmal Kasab at Victoria Terminus railway station, said it had proved detrimental for him during the trial.

Similarly, the bench also cited case of Swapnil alias Pintu Shirke, who was lynched inside district court premises in Nagpur on February 11, 2002, saying there was no CCTV evidence and despite the murder having taken before hundreds of people, no one came forward.

A bench of Justices Adarsh Goel and UU Lalit lauded the government for the “good work” done in installations of CCTV cameras in several tribunals, including the National Green Tribunal, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and National Company Law Tribunal.

“Like 26/11 Mumbai attacks where CCTV cameras at the Victoria Terminus railway station caught one of the perpetrators of the incident, the CCTV use can be beneficial,” the Supreme Court bench said.

As carried in ht

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *